H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 3-0
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 3–0 lead over Isabel Cueto in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1989 US Open second round 5-7 6-3 5-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 5-7 6-3 5-3 (ret.) | Isabel Cueto | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1988* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-1 1-6 6-3 | Isabel Cueto | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-0 7-6(5) | Isabel Cueto | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
| Isabel Cueto | #256 | #20 | 45 | 1,885 | 130 | 101 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | Isabel Cueto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #29 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #31 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #117 | 1,662 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |