H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Jana Novotna H2H: 1-1
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere and Jana Novotna are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jana Novotna leads 1–0 on carpet, while Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1991 Virginia Slims Championships fourth round 6-0 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 1991 | Virginia Slims Championships | WTA Finals | R16 | Carpet | Jana Novotna | 6-0 3-6 6-3 | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | Match data |
| Mar 5, 1988* | Wichita | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-3 5-7 7-5 | Jana Novotna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
| Jana Novotna | #18 | #2 | 5,063 | 2,224 | 504 | 198 | 71.8% | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | Jana Novotna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #35 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #11 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,016 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 | 1991 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 | 1992 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 | 1993 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,103 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 | 1994 | 43–11 | 79.6% | #4 | 2,141 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 | 1995 | 30–12 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 | 1996 | 47–12 | 79.7% | #5 | 2,209 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 52–15 | 77.6% | #2 | 2,173 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,129 | 1 | 23 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,924 | 1 | 24 |