H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Janine Tremelling H2H: 2-1
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 2–1 lead over Janine Tremelling in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1989 Roland Garros fourth round 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 58
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Janine Tremelling | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1986* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Janine Tremelling | 6-2 1-6 6-2 | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | Match data |
| Jan 30, 1986* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Janine Tremelling | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
| Janine Tremelling | #408 | #53 | 14 | 1,723 | 39 | 59 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | Janine Tremelling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #106 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #182 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #214 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |