H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 6-2

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 6–2 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 2–1 on carpet and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1992 Toronto quarterfinal 7-5 6-2.

Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 17, 1992 Toronto WTA 1000 QF Hard Lori Mcneil #22 7-5 6-2 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #9 Match data
Mar 30, 1991* San Antonio WTA 250 QF Hard Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #11 6-3 6-4 Lori Mcneil #31 Match data
Apr 2, 1990* San Antonio WTA 250 SF Hard Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #8 6-0 6-4 Lori Mcneil #42 Match data
Nov 10, 1989* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #9 6-2 6-2 Lori Mcneil #34 Match data
Nov 14, 1988 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #7 6-1 6-0 Lori Mcneil #13 Match data
Apr 9, 1988* Hilton Head WTA 250 QF Clay Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #6 7-6 6-4 Lori Mcneil #10 Match data
Mar 21, 1987* Dallas WTA 250 QF Carpet Lori Mcneil #13 5-7 7-6 6-2 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #11 Match data
Jun 12, 1986* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #10 7-6 2-6 6-4 Lori Mcneil #78 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #5 #3 148 2,128 458 183 71.5% 0 2 0 3 14 19
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1982 15–10 60.0% 1,688 0 0
16 1983 21–16 56.8% 1,788 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
17 1984 50–16 75.8% #6 2,098 0 5 1981 2–0 100.0% 1,520 0 1
18 1985 46–18 71.9% #7 2,073 0 6 1982 1–2 33.3% 1,503 0 1
19 1986 42–21 66.7% #10 1,991 0 6 1983 6–5 54.5% 1,569 0 1
20 1987 44–15 74.6% #8 2,111 0 8 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1988 42–14 75.0% #6 2,091 0 10 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1989 34–13 72.3% #9 2,016 0 12 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1990 42–16 72.4% #9 2,067 0 12 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1991 43–14 75.4% #10 2,027 0 15 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1992 31–12 72.1% #9 1,994 0 16 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1993 36–16 69.2% #11 2,045 0 18 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1994 12–2 85.7% #5 2,066 0 19 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11