H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Manon Bollegraf H2H: 1-1
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere and Manon Bollegraf are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on carpet, while Manon Bollegraf leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Manon Bollegraf won the 1992 Roland Garros third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Manon Bollegraf | 7-5 6-2 | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1990* | Zurich | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | Manon Bollegraf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
| Manon Bollegraf | #649 | #29 | 34 | 1,783 | 96 | 120 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | Manon Bollegraf | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 | 1987 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #117 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 | 1989 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 | 1991 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #44 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #160 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #156 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 |