H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 2-4

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 4–2 lead over Manuela Maleeva Fragniere in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Mary Joe Fernandez leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1993 Montreal quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 21, 1993* Montreal WTA 1000 QF Hard Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #12 6-4 6-4 Mary Joe Fernandez #7 Match data
Jan 27, 1993* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #6 7-5 2-6 6-2 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #10 Match data
Nov 12, 1990 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals QF Carpet Mary Joe Fernandez #4 6-2 6-4 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #9 Match data
Sep 30, 1990* Tokyo Dentsu WTA 250 SF Carpet Mary Joe Fernandez #8 4-6 7-5 6-4 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #9 Match data
Sep 6, 1990* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #8 6-2 2-6 6-1 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #9 Match data
Sep 7, 1987* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #9 6-2 0-6 6-3 Mary Joe Fernandez #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #5 #3 148 2,128 458 183 71.5% 0 2 0 3 14 19
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1982 15–10 60.0% — 1,688 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1983 21–16 56.8% — 1,788 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1984 50–16 75.8% #6 2,098 0 5 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1985 46–18 71.9% #7 2,073 0 6 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1986 42–21 66.7% #10 1,991 0 6 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1987 44–15 74.6% #8 2,111 0 8 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1988 42–14 75.0% #6 2,091 0 10 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1989 34–13 72.3% #9 2,016 0 12 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1990 42–16 72.4% #9 2,067 0 12 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1991 43–14 75.4% #10 2,027 0 15 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1992 31–12 72.1% #9 1,994 0 16 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1993 36–16 69.2% #11 2,045 0 18 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1994 12–2 85.7% #5 2,066 0 19 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7