H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-0

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1992 Bayonne round of 16 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
SUI Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #10 6-0 6-4 Nathalie Herreman #176 Match data Oct 2, 1992* R16 Bayonne Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #5 #3 148 2,130 464 185 71.5% 0 1 0 3 15 19
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1982 15–10 60.0% — 1,687 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1983 21–16 56.8% — 1,788 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1984 50–16 75.8% #6 2,100 0 5 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1985 46–18 71.9% #7 2,074 0 6 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1986 42–21 66.7% #8 1,992 0 6 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1987 44–15 74.6% #8 2,113 0 8 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1988 45–15 75.0% #6 2,101 0 10 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1989 34–13 72.3% #9 2,018 0 12 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1990 42–16 72.4% #9 2,068 0 12 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1991 43–14 75.4% #10 2,027 0 15 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1992 34–13 72.3% #9 1,998 0 16 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1993 36–16 69.2% #11 2,045 0 18 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1994 12–2 85.7% #5 2,067 0 19 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 27 5 32 84.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1985 7 4 11 63.6% 16 6 22 72.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 5 18 72.2% 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1986 13 5 18 72.2% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1987 9 3 12 75.0% 19 5 24 79.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1988 23 5 28 82.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1989 15 5 20 75.0% 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1990 19 6 25 76.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 17 4 21 81.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1992 13 4 17 76.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1993 16 5 21 76.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1994 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — 8 1 9 88.9% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 145 53 198 73.2% 156 62 218 71.6% 38 20 58 65.5% 125 50 175 71.4% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1982 1687 121.9 — — — — -88 -61 -1 55.2% +0.14 6–2 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1788 136.4 — — — — -118 0 -127 57.1% +0.45 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.8 -0.81 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1984 2100 169.1 — — — — -162 +37 -327 70.4% +1.55 13–7 (65%) 6–2 (75%) 112.5 -2.65 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1985 2075 161.4 — — — — -47 +9 -202 70.6% +1.90 6–4 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 +0.26 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1986 1992 161.4 — — — — -4 +32 -50 65.7% +1.31 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) 90.2 -2.54 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1987 2114 165.6 — — — — -24 -9 -171 68.6% +1.51 14–8 (64%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 -3.96 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1988 2102 162.5 — — — — +47 -50 — 73.1% +1.85 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 96.3 -1.34 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1989 2019 154.6 — — — — +29 +17 — 69.0% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.98 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1990 2068 173.2 — — — — +58 -41 — 68.5% +1.77 9–7 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.3 -2.84 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1991 2028 159.1 — — — — +51 +26 — 72.7% +1.77 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 +1.33 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1992 1999 152.0 — — — — +87 +17 -90 67.0% +1.41 10–3 (77%) 2–4 (33%) 101.2 +2.30 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1993 2046 159.7 — — — — +80 -115 — 65.8% +1.04 8–7 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -0.01 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1994 2067 143.1 — — — — +48 — — 77.4% +2.36 3–0 (100%) 0–2 — +0.52 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
Career — 2131 166.2 — — — — +16 -4 -133 68.1% +1.46 97–70 (58%) 48–41 (54%) 101.4 -1.10 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.