H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Patty Fendick H2H: 2-1

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 2–1 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1992 Zurich Open round of 16 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
SUI Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patty Fendick #61 6-3 6-3 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #9 Match data Oct 9, 1992* R16 Zurich Open WTA 500 Carpet
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #9 6-1 6-2 Patty Fendick #44 Match data Aug 10, 1990* R16 San Diego Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #8 6-4 7-5 Patty Fendick #36 Match data Feb 16, 1990* R16 Chicago Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere — #3 148 2,131 464 185 71.5% 0 1 0 2 16 19
Patty Fendick — #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Patty Fendick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1982 15–10 60.0% — 1,687 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1983 21–16 56.8% — 1,789 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1984 50–16 75.8% #6 2,100 0 5 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
18 1985 46–18 71.9% #7 2,075 0 6 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0
19 1986 42–21 66.7% #8 1,992 0 6 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0
20 1987 44–15 74.6% #8 2,114 0 8 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,551 0 0
21 1988 45–15 75.0% #6 2,102 0 10 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0
22 1989 34–13 72.3% #9 2,019 0 12 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0
23 1990 42–16 72.4% #9 2,068 0 12 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2
24 1991 43–14 75.4% #10 2,028 0 15 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3
25 1992 34–13 72.3% #9 1,998 0 16 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,740 0 3
26 1993 36–16 69.2% #11 2,046 0 18 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,689 0 3
27 1994 12–2 85.7% — 2,067 0 19 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,778 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,725 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,690 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Patty Fendick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 27 5 32 84.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 7 4 11 63.6% 16 6 22 72.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 5 18 72.2% 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1986 13 5 18 72.2% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 1984 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 9 3 12 75.0% 19 5 24 79.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1988 23 5 28 82.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 1989 15 5 20 75.0% 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1990 19 6 25 76.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 1988 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 17 4 21 81.0% 1989 19 8 27 70.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1992 13 4 17 76.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1990 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1993 16 5 21 76.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1991 9 13 22 40.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1994 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — 8 1 9 88.9% 1992 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 145 53 198 73.2% 156 62 218 71.6% 38 20 58 65.5% 125 50 175 71.4% — 129 93 222 58.1% 10 14 24 41.7% 39 31 70 55.7% 21 24 45 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Patty Fendick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1982 1688 121.9 — — — — -90 -61 -1 55.2% +0.14 6–2 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1789 136.5 — — — — -119 0 -127 57.1% +0.45 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.8 -0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 2101 169.3 — — — — -162 +36 -328 70.4% +1.55 13–7 (65%) 6–2 (75%) 112.6 -2.55 1982 1500 107.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.32
18 1985 2076 161.5 — — — — -48 +9 -203 70.6% +1.90 6–4 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 -0.41 1983 1430 95.2 — — — — +124 +82 — 27.3% -1.46 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +1.00
19 1986 1993 161.5 — — — — -5 +31 -52 65.7% +1.31 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) 90.3 -2.26 1984 1471 109.1 — — — — +101 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 — — +0.32
20 1987 2114 165.7 — — — — -24 -9 -172 68.6% +1.51 14–8 (64%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 -4.28 1985 1551 125.3 — — — — +52 — +32 47.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.31
21 1988 2102 162.5 — — — — +47 -48 — 73.1% +1.85 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 96.3 -1.56 1986 1643 127.6 — — — — -8 — -4 58.6% +1.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.36
22 1989 2019 154.6 — — — — +29 +17 — 69.0% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +1.23 1987 1674 134.6 — — — — -14 — -12 47.5% +0.10 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — -0.41
23 1990 2069 173.2 — — — — +56 -42 — 68.5% +1.77 9–7 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.3 -2.84 1988 1798 142.3 — — — — +12 — -57 68.9% +1.29 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.4 +4.30
24 1991 2028 159.2 — — — — +51 +26 — 72.7% +1.77 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 +1.33 1989 1763 138.7 — — — — +29 — -46 62.3% +0.83 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +2.23
25 1992 1999 152.0 — — — — +87 +17 -91 67.0% +1.41 10–3 (77%) 2–4 (33%) 101.2 +2.30 1990 1740 136.1 — — — — +4 — +11 54.8% +0.16 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 +0.10
26 1993 2046 159.7 — — — — +80 -115 — 65.8% +1.04 8–7 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -0.01 1991 1690 123.1 — — — — -46 -90 +29 47.3% -0.30 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.64
27 1994 2068 143.1 — — — — +47 — — 77.4% +2.36 3–0 (100%) 0–2 — +0.52 1992 1779 141.8 — — — — -33 -186 +25 51.9% +0.05 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.9 -0.86
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1840 147.9 — — — — -10 — +29 62.1% +0.58 5–6 (45%) 8–0 (100%) 104.7 -0.37
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1725 142.3 — — — — +38 — +70 55.9% +0.41 5–11 (31%) 6–4 (60%) 95.7 +0.50
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1691 136.0 — — — — +70 -105 +56 51.7% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.2 -0.51
Career — 2131 166.2 — — — — +15 -4 -134 68.1% +1.46 97–70 (58%) 48–41 (54%) 101.4 -1.19 — 1883 144.9 — — — — +11 -96 +4 56.2% +0.38 45–57 (44%) 39–27 (59%) 101.0 +2.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.