H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Sara Gomer H2H: 0-1
Sara Gomer holds a 1–0 lead over Manuela Maleeva Fragniere in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1990 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Sara Gomer | 6-2 6-3 | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | Sara Gomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |