H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Zina Garrison H2H: 4-2

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 4–2 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 2–1 on carpet and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1990 Chicago semifinal 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
SUI Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main-draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #8 6-2 6-0 Zina Garrison #4 Match data Feb 17, 1990* SF Chicago Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Zina Garrison #5 6-3 4-6 6-1 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #9 Match data Nov 11, 1989* SF Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #11 6-2 7-5 Zina Garrison #7 Match data Apr 11, 1987* QF Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #19 7-5 6-2 Zina Garrison #8 Match data Apr 21, 1984* QF Amelia Island Championships WTA 500 Clay
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #31 6-3 4-6 6-2 Zina Garrison #9 Match data Feb 4, 1984* QF Houston WTA 250 Carpet
Zina Garrison 6-1 7-5 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Match data Feb 2, 1983* R32 Palm Beach WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere — #3 148 2,131 464 185 71.5% 0 1 0 2 16 19
Zina Garrison — #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1982 15–10 60.0% — 1,687 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1983 21–16 56.8% — 1,789 0 0 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1984 50–16 75.8% #6 2,100 0 5 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,569 0 1
18 1985 46–18 71.9% #7 2,075 0 6 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,854 0 1
19 1986 42–21 66.7% #8 1,992 0 6 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,991 0 1
20 1987 44–15 74.6% #8 2,114 0 8 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,013 0 2
21 1988 45–15 75.0% #6 2,102 0 10 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4
22 1989 34–13 72.3% #9 2,019 0 12 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5
23 1990 42–16 72.4% #9 2,068 0 12 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7
24 1991 43–14 75.4% #10 2,028 0 15 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7
25 1992 34–13 72.3% #9 1,998 0 16 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10
26 1993 36–16 69.2% #11 2,046 0 18 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11
27 1994 12–2 85.7% — 2,067 0 19 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,964 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12
29 — — — — — — — 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 — — — — — — — 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Zina Garrison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 27 5 32 84.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1985 7 4 11 63.6% 16 6 22 72.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 5 18 72.2% 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1986 13 5 18 72.2% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5%
20 1987 9 3 12 75.0% 19 5 24 79.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4%
21 1988 23 5 28 82.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7%
22 1989 15 5 20 75.0% 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5%
23 1990 19 6 25 76.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0%
24 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 17 4 21 81.0% 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1992 13 4 17 76.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9%
26 1993 16 5 21 76.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
27 1994 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — 8 1 9 88.9% 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
Career — 145 53 198 73.2% 156 62 218 71.6% 38 20 58 65.5% 125 50 175 71.4% — 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Zina Garrison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1982 1688 121.9 — — — — -90 -61 -1 55.2% +0.14 6–2 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1789 136.5 — — — — -119 0 -127 57.1% +0.45 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.8 -0.63 1980 1530 117.5 — — — — +50 — — 55.6% +0.56 0–1 — — +0.24
17 1984 2101 169.3 — — — — -162 +36 -328 70.4% +1.55 13–7 (65%) 6–2 (75%) 112.6 -2.55 1981 1570 122.6 — — — — +75 — — 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) — — +1.07
18 1985 2076 161.5 — — — — -48 +9 -203 70.6% +1.90 6–4 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 -0.41 1982 1854 155.2 — — — — -184 -169 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -4.44
19 1986 1993 161.5 — — — — -5 +31 -52 65.7% +1.31 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) 90.3 -2.26 1983 1992 154.7 — — — — -125 -109 -51 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.42
20 1987 2114 165.7 — — — — -24 -9 -172 68.6% +1.51 14–8 (64%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 -4.28 1984 2014 157.4 — — — — +14 -97 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 -0.88
21 1988 2102 162.5 — — — — +47 -48 — 73.1% +1.85 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 96.3 -1.56 1985 2034 160.3 — — — — +48 -57 -43 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +0.81
22 1989 2019 154.6 — — — — +29 +17 — 69.0% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +1.23 1986 2001 159.4 — — — — +95 -126 -22 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.14
23 1990 2069 173.2 — — — — +56 -42 — 68.5% +1.77 9–7 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.3 -2.84 1987 1989 166.9 — — — — +36 -61 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.84
24 1991 2028 159.2 — — — — +51 +26 — 72.7% +1.77 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 +1.33 1988 2044 162.1 — — — — +19 -90 +74 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.42
25 1992 1999 152.0 — — — — +87 +17 -91 67.0% +1.41 10–3 (77%) 2–4 (33%) 101.2 +2.30 1989 2136 170.0 — — — — +58 -213 -22 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.27
26 1993 2046 159.7 — — — — +80 -115 — 65.8% +1.04 8–7 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -0.01 1990 2042 161.7 — — — — +13 -145 +212 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68
27 1994 2068 143.1 — — — — +47 — — 77.4% +2.36 3–0 (100%) 0–2 — +0.52 1991 1964 154.0 — — — — +29 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1915 157.8 — — — — +40 -53 +313 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1996 160.6 — — — — +23 -216 +200 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.21
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1889 145.4 — — — — +24 -186 +260 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1869 147.9 — — — — +28 -240 +310 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1712 111.9 — — — — +24 — — 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.20
Career — 2131 166.2 — — — — +15 -4 -134 68.1% +1.46 97–70 (58%) 48–41 (54%) 101.4 -1.19 — 2147 164.7 — — — — +27 -112 +90 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.