H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Zina Garrison H2H: 4-2

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 4–2 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 2–1 on carpet and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1990 Chicago semifinal 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 17, 1990* Chicago WTA 1000 SF Carpet Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #8 6-2 6-0 Zina Garrison #4 Match data
Nov 11, 1989* Chicago WTA 250 SF Carpet Zina Garrison #5 6-3 4-6 6-1 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #9 Match data
Apr 11, 1987* Hilton Head WTA 250 QF Clay Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #11 6-2 7-5 Zina Garrison #7 Match data
Apr 21, 1984* Amelia Island WTA 250 QF Clay Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #19 7-5 6-2 Zina Garrison #8 Match data
Feb 4, 1984* Houston WTA 250 QF Carpet Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #31 6-3 4-6 6-2 Zina Garrison #9 Match data
Feb 2, 1983* Palm Beach WTA 250 R32 Clay Zina Garrison 6-1 7-5 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #5 #3 148 2,128 458 183 71.5% 0 2 0 3 14 19
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1982 15–10 60.0% — 1,688 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1983 21–16 56.8% — 1,788 0 0 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1984 50–16 75.8% #6 2,098 0 5 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1
18 1985 46–18 71.9% #7 2,073 0 6 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1986 42–21 66.7% #10 1,991 0 6 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1
20 1987 44–15 74.6% #8 2,111 0 8 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1988 42–14 75.0% #6 2,091 0 10 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1989 34–13 72.3% #9 2,016 0 12 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 1990 42–16 72.4% #9 2,067 0 12 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 1991 43–14 75.4% #10 2,027 0 15 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 1992 31–12 72.1% #9 1,994 0 16 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 1993 36–16 69.2% #11 2,045 0 18 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 1994 12–2 85.7% #5 2,066 0 19 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 — — — — — — — 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 — — — — — — — 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15