H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marcela Bueno vs Rosie Casals H2H: 2-2
Marcela Bueno and Rosie Casals are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marcela Bueno leads 2–0 on grass, while Rosie Casals leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rosie Casals won the 1976 US Open third round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 77
Right-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 1976* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Rosie Casals | 7-5 6-0 | Marcela Bueno | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1968* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Rosie Casals | 6-4 6-1 | Marcela Bueno | Match data |
| Jul 3, 1968* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Marcela Bueno | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1968* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Marcela Bueno | 9-7 3-6 7-5 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcela Bueno | — | — | — | 1,886 | 73 | 42 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Rosie Casals | #207 | #55 | — | 2,203 | 594 | 322 | 64.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marcela Bueno | Rosie Casals | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 36–8 | 81.8% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 1969 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 42–19 | 68.9% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 |
| 1974 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 52–21 | 71.2% | — | 2,035 | 0 | 4 |
| 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 92–31 | 74.8% | — | 2,162 | 0 | 7 |
| 1976 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 64–26 | 71.1% | — | 2,098 | 0 | 10 |
| 1977 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 81–28 | 74.3% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 43–16 | 72.9% | — | 2,127 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 39–17 | 69.6% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 41–20 | 67.2% | — | 2,044 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 24–15 | 61.5% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 19–26 | 42.2% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 14–25 | 35.9% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #172 | 1,610 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 12 |