Marcie Louie
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betty Stove | 2 | 4 | 6 | Feb 22, 1979 | H2H |
| Billie Jean King | 1 | 5 | 6 | Mar 25, 1977 | H2H |
| Lesley Hunt | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 2, 1975 | H2H |
| Chris Evert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 29, 1980 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 21, 1977 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Marcie Louie vs Esme Emmanuel H2H: 1-1
Marcie Louie and Esme Emmanuel are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Esme Emmanuel won the 1970 Sacramento round of 16 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esme Emmanuel | 7-5 6-4 | Marcie Louie | Match data | May 8, 1970* | R16 | Sacramento | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Marcie Louie | 6-3 6-2 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data | Sep 27, 1968* | R32 | Berkeley | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,865 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Esme Emmanuel | — | — | — | 1,773 | 77 | 85 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcie Louie | Esme Emmanuel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 19–14 | 57.6% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 4–17 | 19.0% | — | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Marcie Louie | Esme Emmanuel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | 1968 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1968 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 22 | 1976 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 1969 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 1977 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1970 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1979 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1972 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1980 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1981 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1982 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 28 | 41 | 69 | 40.6% | 32 | 35 | 67 | 47.8% | 13 | 18 | 31 | 41.9% | 26 | 44 | 70 | 37.1% | — | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 24 | 29 | 53 | 45.3% | 29 | 25 | 54 | 53.7% | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Marcie Louie | Esme Emmanuel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 1968 | 1492 | 100.8 | — | — | — | — | +9 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.43 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 1545 | 108.9 | — | — | — | — | +74 | — | — | 72.7% | +1.73 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 1565 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | — | 46.2% | +0.08 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 1593 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -48 | 50.0% | -0.42 | — | — | — | +1.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 1699 | 128.6 | — | — | — | — | -98 | -107 | +10 | 47.1% | -0.29 | 5–2 (71%) | 1–2 (33%) | 103.2 | -3.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 1627 | 126.7 | — | — | — | — | -36 | -91 | — | 24.6% | -1.54 | 3–2 (60%) | 3–4 (43%) | 100.9 | -3.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 1684 | 131.0 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -120 | — | 40.0% | -0.75 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–1 (80%) | 105.8 | -1.83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 1784 | 141.4 | — | — | — | — | -69 | -51 | — | 49.3% | -0.27 | 4–3 (57%) | 6–1 (86%) | 106.0 | -1.61 | 1968 | 1510 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | -13 | +12 | +2 | 47.3% | -0.33 | 1–6 (14%) | — | — | +0.43 |
| 22 | 1976 | 1788 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | -63 | -23 | -148 | 45.2% | -0.10 | 6–2 (75%) | 2–7 (22%) | 101.6 | -2.81 | 1969 | 1658 | 119.2 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -96 | -61 | 53.9% | +0.20 | 7–3 (70%) | — | — | -0.76 |
| 23 | 1977 | 1649 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +9 | — | 35.1% | -1.01 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–6 (33%) | 99.4 | -0.50 | 1970 | 1745 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | -17 | -69 | -74 | 58.9% | +0.80 | 6–7 (46%) | 0–1 | — | +0.03 |
| 24 | 1978 | 1602 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.25 | — | — | — | +0.67 | 1971 | 1670 | 123.4 | — | — | — | — | -35 | -59 | -11 | 21.4% | -2.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–2 | — | -2.46 |
| 25 | 1979 | 1610 | 120.6 | — | — | — | — | +45 | — | — | 31.3% | -1.81 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.60 | 1972 | 1691 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | -123 | -130 | +35 | 39.4% | -1.01 | 7–2 (78%) | 1–0 | — | -3.87 |
| 26 | 1980 | 1609 | 110.6 | — | — | — | — | +2 | +54 | — | 47.7% | -0.20 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +0.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1981 | 1609 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.27 | 1–0 | 2–0 | — | +0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1982 | 1576 | 93.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1866 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -46 | -24 | 41.3% | -0.61 | 36–23 (61%) | 22–23 (49%) | 108.5 | -3.96 | — | 1773 | 126.6 | — | — | — | — | -15 | -59 | -24 | 47.6% | -0.21 | 22–21 (51%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.5 | -4.20 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Esme Emmanuel
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosie Casals | 0 | 7 | 7 | Sep 22, 1972 | H2H |
| Judy Tegart | 0 | 6 | 6 | Apr 8, 1972 | H2H |
| Billie Jean King | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 5, 1972 | H2H |
| Betty Ann Grubb | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 26, 1970 | H2H |
| Francoise Durr | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 17, 1972 | H2H |