H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Marcie Louie vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-0

Marcie Louie holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcie Louie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcie Louie won the 1970 San Francisco Sectionals semifinal 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcie Louie
USA Age 73
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 74

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcie Louie 6-0 6-1 Kate Latham Match data May 9, 1970* SF San Francisco Sectionals WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marcie Louie — — — 1,865 103 142 42.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Kate Latham — — — 1,865 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcie Louie Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1969 4–1 80.0% — 1,545 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1970 3–3 50.0% — 1,564 0 2 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1971 4–3 57.1% — 1,593 0 3 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1972 19–20 48.7% — 1,699 0 3 — — — — — — —
19 1973 7–20 25.9% — 1,626 0 3 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1974 11–17 39.3% — 1,684 0 3 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1975 16–15 51.6% — 1,784 0 4 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1976 13–16 44.8% — 1,788 0 4 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1977 11–22 33.3% — 1,650 0 4 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1978 0–2 0.0% — 1,602 0 4 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,749 0 3
25 1979 2–5 28.6% — 1,610 0 4 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,662 0 3
26 1980 10–11 47.6% — 1,602 0 4 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,853 0 3
27 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,604 0 4 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4
28 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,571 0 4 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,775 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,685 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,624 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,493 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,527 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marcie Louie Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1968 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1969 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1970 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1971 2 0 2 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1972 1 4 5 20.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1974 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1976 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1977 3 5 8 37.5% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 5 8 13 38.5% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1980 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1981 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1982 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 28 41 69 40.6% 32 35 67 47.8% 13 18 31 41.9% 26 45 71 36.6% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marcie Louie Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1968 1492 100.8 — — — — +9 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1969 1545 108.9 — — — — +74 — — 72.7% +1.73 1–0 — — +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1970 1565 106.0 — — — — +51 — — 46.2% +0.08 1–0 1–1 — +0.63 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1971 1593 107.1 — — — — — — -48 50.0% -0.42 — — — +1.18 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1972 1699 128.6 — — — — -98 -107 +10 47.1% -0.29 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 103.2 -3.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1973 1627 126.7 — — — — -36 -91 — 24.6% -1.54 3–2 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 100.9 -3.14 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.61
20 1974 1684 131.0 — — — — -38 -120 — 40.0% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 105.8 -1.68 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1975 1784 141.4 — — — — -69 -51 — 49.3% -0.27 4–3 (57%) 6–1 (86%) 106.0 -0.95 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.17
22 1976 1788 133.1 — — — — -63 -22 -147 45.2% -0.10 6–2 (75%) 2–7 (22%) 101.6 -2.82 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.71
23 1977 1650 127.9 — — — — +26 +7 — 35.1% -1.01 6–5 (55%) 3–6 (33%) 99.4 -0.75 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.34
24 1978 1602 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.63 1977 1750 140.9 — — — — -8 -120 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -1.23
25 1979 1611 120.8 — — — — +45 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 — — -0.60 1978 1663 118.4 — — — — +3 -12 +67 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +1.97
26 1980 1603 107.9 — — — — -15 +61 — 45.7% -0.37 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.85 1979 1853 149.7 — — — — -20 -164 -98 46.0% -0.27 8–6 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 -2.28
27 1981 1604 104.8 — — — — +26 — — 36.4% -1.27 1–0 2–0 — +0.26 1980 1750 133.2 — — — — -27 — +15 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.93
28 1982 1571 93.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.13 1981 1776 142.9 — — — — -18 — +4 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.97
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1686 128.3 — — — — +50 -103 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.20
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1624 115.1 — — — — +52 -49 +72 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.86
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1493 91.7 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 1866 132.7 — — — — -24 -45 -23 41.2% -0.62 36–23 (61%) 22–23 (49%) 108.5 -3.51 — 1866 138.2 — — — — -3 -78 -9 49.2% -0.03 56–61 (48%) 41–38 (52%) 101.2 +0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.