H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marcie Louie vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-0
Marcie Louie holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcie Louie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcie Louie won the 1970 San Francisco Sectionals semifinal 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 1970* | San Francisco Sectionals | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Marcie Louie | 6-0 6-1 | Kate Latham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,866 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcie Louie | Kate Latham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 6 |