H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marcie Louie vs Laurie Tenney H2H: 3-1
Marcie Louie holds a 3–1 lead over Laurie Tenney in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Marcie Louie leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marcie Louie won the 1976 Indianapolis third round 6-1 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1976* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcie Louie | 6-1 2-6 7-5 | Laurie Tenney | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1974* | Denver | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marcie Louie | 6-3 6-3 | Laurie Tenney | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1972* | Tucson | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Laurie Tenney | 7-6 6-4 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1971* | Berkeley | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Marcie Louie | 3-6 7-5 5-2 (ret.) | Laurie Tenney | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Laurie Tenney | — | — | — | 1,720 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcie Louie | Laurie Tenney | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 17–11 | 60.7% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |