H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Marcie Louie vs Marie Pinterova H2H: 2-0
Marcie Louie holds a 2–0 lead over Marie Pinterova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcie Louie leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcie Louie won the 1972 St. Petersburg third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 72
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 1972* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Marcie Louie | 6-1 6-2 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
| Jan 29, 1972* | Boston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marcie Louie | 6-4 6-4 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Marie Pinterova | — | — | — | 1,782 | 136 | 147 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcie Louie | Marie Pinterova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 12 |