H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Marcie Louie vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 1-1

Marcie Louie and Mima Jausovec are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcie Louie leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcie Louie won the 1977 Seattle round of 32 1-6 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcie Louie
USA Age 73
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcie Louie 1-6 7-6 6-3 Mima Jausovec Match data Feb 3, 1977* R32 Seattle WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-0 1-0 (ret.) Marcie Louie Match data Sep 9, 1976* R16 US Open Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marcie Louie — — — 1,865 103 141 42.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcie Louie Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1969 4–1 80.0% — 1,545 0 1 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 1970 3–3 50.0% — 1,564 0 2 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 1971 4–3 57.1% — 1,593 0 3 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1
18 1972 19–20 48.7% — 1,699 0 3 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1
19 1973 7–20 25.9% — 1,626 0 3 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,004 0 4
20 1974 11–17 39.3% — 1,684 0 3 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5
21 1975 16–15 51.6% — 1,784 0 4 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6
22 1976 13–16 44.8% — 1,787 0 4 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,870 1 6
23 1977 11–22 33.3% — 1,649 0 4 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,945 1 6
24 1978 0–2 0.0% — 1,601 0 4 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,013 1 6
25 1979 2–5 28.6% — 1,609 0 4 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,857 1 7
26 1980 10–10 50.0% — 1,609 0 4 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7
27 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,609 0 4 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7
28 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,576 0 4 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7
29 — — — — — — — 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 — — — — — — — 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marcie Louie Mima Jausovec
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1968 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1969 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1970 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 1971 2 0 2 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1972 1 4 5 20.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2%
19 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
20 1974 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6%
21 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
22 1976 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2%
23 1977 3 5 8 37.5% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 5 8 13 38.5% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
24 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
25 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
26 1980 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1981 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
28 1982 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 41 69 40.6% 32 35 67 47.8% 13 18 31 41.9% 26 44 70 37.1% — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marcie Louie Mima Jausovec
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1968 1492 100.8 — — — — +9 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1969 1545 108.9 — — — — +74 — — 72.7% +1.73 1–0 — — +0.89 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55
16 1970 1565 106.0 — — — — +51 — — 46.2% +0.08 1–0 1–1 — +0.63 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.21
17 1971 1593 107.1 — — — — — — -48 50.0% -0.42 — — — +1.18 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90
18 1972 1699 128.6 — — — — -98 -107 +10 47.1% -0.29 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 103.2 -3.23 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97
19 1973 1627 126.7 — — — — -36 -91 — 24.6% -1.54 3–2 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 100.9 -3.41 1976 2004 156.6 — — — — -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78
20 1974 1684 131.0 — — — — -38 -120 — 40.0% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 105.8 -1.83 1977 2011 161.6 — — — — -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51
21 1975 1784 141.4 — — — — -69 -51 — 49.3% -0.27 4–3 (57%) 6–1 (86%) 106.0 -1.61 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80
22 1976 1788 133.0 — — — — -63 -23 -148 45.2% -0.10 6–2 (75%) 2–7 (22%) 101.6 -2.81 1979 1871 146.4 — — — — -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84
23 1977 1649 127.8 — — — — +26 +9 — 35.1% -1.01 6–5 (55%) 3–6 (33%) 99.4 -0.50 1980 1945 155.9 — — — — +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63
24 1978 1602 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.67 1981 2013 157.1 — — — — 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76
25 1979 1610 120.6 — — — — +45 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 — — -0.60 1982 1858 148.5 — — — — +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56
26 1980 1609 110.6 — — — — +2 +54 — 47.7% -0.20 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.67 1983 1874 143.9 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67
27 1981 1609 104.8 — — — — +37 — — 36.4% -1.27 1–0 2–0 — +0.25 1984 1748 131.7 — — — — -27 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31
28 1982 1576 93.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12 1985 1695 127.6 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1673 105.7 — — — — — +197 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1656 107.2 — — — — — +179 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.33
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1641 110.1 — — — — — +162 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77
Career — 1866 133.0 — — — — -23 -46 -24 41.3% -0.61 36–23 (61%) 22–23 (49%) 108.5 -3.96 — 2091 156.0 — — — — -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.