H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Marcie Louie vs Nancy Richey H2H: 0-4
Nancy Richey holds a 4–0 lead over Marcie Louie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nancy Richey leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nancy Richey won the 1976 Houston quarterfinal 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 72
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 83
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 1976* | Houston | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Nancy Richey | 6-2 6-2 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1974* | Denver | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Nancy Richey | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1974* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nancy Richey | 6-3 6-1 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Feb 5, 1972* | Fort Lauderdale Pro | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-3 6-0 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcie Louie | Nancy Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 |
| 26 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 |