H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marcie Louie vs Valerie Ziegenfuss H2H: 1-4
Valerie Ziegenfuss holds a 4–1 lead over Marcie Louie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Valerie Ziegenfuss leads 2–1 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Valerie Ziegenfuss won the 1975 Phoenix third round 6-4 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 1975* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 6-4 6-7 6-3 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Jan 27, 1975 | Washington | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 6-2 6-3 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Mar 29, 1974* | New York | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Marcie Louie | 2-6 7-5 6-4 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
| Mar 1, 1974* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 6-3 6-4 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Jan 21, 1973* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 6-3 6-1 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Valerie Ziegenfuss | — | — | — | 1,952 | 231 | 232 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcie Louie | Valerie Ziegenfuss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 40–28 | 58.8% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 23–29 | 44.2% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 33–29 | 53.2% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 3 |