H2H data updated: 2026-11-02 00:00 UTC

Mareen Louie Harper vs Emilse Raponi Longo H2H: 1-0

Mareen Louie Harper holds a 1–0 lead over Emilse Raponi Longo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mareen Louie Harper leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mareen Louie Harper won the 1984 Salt Lake City round of 32 4-6 6-4 7-5.

H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mareen Louie Harper 4-6 6-4 7-5 Emilse Raponi Longo Match data Sep 13, 1984* R32 Salt Lake City WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,911 179 240 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Emilse Raponi Longo — — — 1,593 32 62 34.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mareen Louie Harper Emilse Raponi Longo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
16 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1978 9–13 40.9% — 1,599 0 0 1975 0–2 0.0% — 1,453 0 0
18 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,719 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,745 0 0 1978 4–2 66.7% — 1,530 0 0
21 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,656 0 0 1979 5–6 45.5% — 1,568 0 0
22 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,672 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,558 0 0
23 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,734 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,777 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,680 0 2 1983 3–7 30.0% — 1,571 0 0
26 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2 1984 11–13 45.8% — 1,577 0 0
27 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2 1985 6–14 30.0% — 1,504 0 0
28 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2 1986 2–7 22.2% — 1,472 0 0
29 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2 1987 1–6 14.3% — 1,445 0 0
30 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2 1988 0–3 0.0% — 1,409 0 0
31 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,537 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mareen Louie Harper Emilse Raponi Longo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1974 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 1978 — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1984 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1988 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 3 6 9 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1989 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1990 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
30 1991 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 106 119 225 47.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 47 78 125 37.6% — 12 19 31 38.7% 20 39 59 33.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mareen Louie Harper Emilse Raponi Longo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.37 1973 1484 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.22
16 1977 1520 116.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 1599 122.7 — — — — +32 -41 — 39.2% -0.96 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.4 +0.50 1975 1453 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.49
18 1979 1576 121.8 — — — — +27 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1719 129.4 — — — — -38 -158 -41 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.4 +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 1746 134.8 — — — — -2 — -75 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 -1.67 1978 1531 110.5 — — — — — +38 — 54.5% +0.36 1–0 1–0 — -0.05
21 1982 1656 125.3 — — — — -25 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.44 1979 1569 118.7 — — — — — +80 — 44.0% -0.12 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.0 +0.53
22 1983 1672 132.3 — — — — -12 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.3 -0.96 1980 1559 101.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.20
23 1984 1734 127.7 — — — — +24 — -95 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 1778 143.9 — — — — +52 — -156 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 1680 121.3 — — — — +20 — -64 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.36 1983 1572 126.9 — — — — — +69 — 39.1% -0.91 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.0 -0.45
26 1987 1624 119.6 — — — — +7 — -16 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.21 1984 1578 106.1 — — — — +16 +22 — 46.4% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +3.04
27 1988 1614 129.2 — — — — +12 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.37 1985 1505 102.4 — — — — +47 -8 — 39.1% -0.70 0–6 (0%) 0–6 (0%) 89.0 +2.06
28 1989 1577 117.4 — — — — -17 — -22 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.28 1986 1472 93.5 — — — — — -22 — 23.8% -2.00 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.19
29 1990 1591 128.5 — — — — +9 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31 1987 1445 95.9 — — — — — -32 — 18.8% -2.63 1–1 1–1 — 0.00
30 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46 1988 1409 89.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 0–1 — +0.38
31 1992 1545 105.5 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1911 135.4 — — — — +8 -84 -60 42.6% -0.56 76–57 (57%) 41–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.20 — 1594 108.2 — — — — +27 +23 — 37.4% -0.97 10–18 (36%) 6–17 (26%) 89.7 +6.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.