H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mareen Louie Harper vs Kay Mcdaniel H2H: 1-0
Mareen Louie Harper holds a 1–0 lead over Kay Mcdaniel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mareen Louie Harper leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mareen Louie Harper won the 1980 Detroit second round 6-4 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 1980* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Mareen Louie Harper | 6-4 6-7 6-4 | Kay Mcdaniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mareen Louie Harper | — | — | — | 1,911 | 177 | 239 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kay Mcdaniel | — | — | — | 1,653 | 18 | 40 | 31.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mareen Louie Harper | Kay Mcdaniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1978 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 22–23 | 48.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1987 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1990 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |