H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Mareen Louie Harper vs Renee Richards H2H: 1-0

Mareen Louie Harper holds a 1–0 lead over Renee Richards in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mareen Louie Harper leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mareen Louie Harper won the 1978 Mahwah round of 32 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mareen Louie Harper
USA Age 66
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Renee Richards
USA Age 92 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mareen Louie Harper 6-4 6-1 Renee Richards Match data Aug 24, 1978* R32 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,910 177 239 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Renee Richards — — — 1,864 117 86 57.6% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mareen Louie Harper Renee Richards
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1978 7–12 36.8% — 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,714 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,743 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,671 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,733 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,776 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,679 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,536 0 2 — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — 1976 12–2 85.7% — 1,672 0 1
42 — — — — — — — 1977 24–10 70.6% — 1,833 0 2
43 — — — — — — — 1978 12–13 48.0% — 1,806 0 2
44 — — — — — — — 1979 17–24 41.5% — 1,832 0 2
45 — — — — — — — 1980 47–28 62.7% — 1,753 0 7
46 — — — — — — — 1981 5–8 38.5% — 1,697 0 8
47 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,671 0 8

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mareen Louie Harper Renee Richards
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1977 1520 116.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 1589 122.4 — — — — +31 -31 — 34.1% -1.25 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) 108.1 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 1568 121.3 — — — — +25 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1714 128.5 — — — — -41 -153 -36 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.6 +1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 1743 134.3 — — — — -2 — -72 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 105.0 -1.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1982 1655 124.8 — — — — -27 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1983 1671 132.0 — — — — -14 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.4 -0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 1733 127.5 — — — — +24 — -94 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 1777 143.7 — — — — +52 — -157 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 1680 121.2 — — — — +20 — -65 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 1624 119.5 — — — — +6 — -17 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1988 1614 129.1 — — — — +11 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 1576 117.3 — — — — -17 — -21 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1590 128.4 — — — — +10 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1545 105.4 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1673 122.7 — — — — +101 -96 — 80.0% +2.03 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — +3.38
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1834 139.4 — — — — +5 -171 — 69.0% +1.55 2–3 (40%) 1–6 (14%) 94.7 +3.72
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1807 137.7 — — — — -59 -74 — 41.5% -0.23 5–4 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 102.0 -0.34
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1833 155.6 — — — — -81 -15 — 45.4% -0.38 5–10 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.0 -5.38
45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1754 139.6 — — — — +24 +23 — 60.1% +0.89 11–8 (58%) 2–7 (22%) 95.0 +1.26
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1697 123.6 — — — — — +80 — 38.7% -0.61 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -1.39
47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1672 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.18
Career — 1911 135.2 — — — — +7 -78 -59 42.4% -0.57 76–56 (58%) 40–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.10 — 1864 146.0 — — — — -10 -46 — 55.7% +0.53 28–29 (49%) 14–22 (39%) 94.2 +0.70

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.