H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Margaret Court vs Betty Ann Grubb H2H: 3-0
Margaret Court holds a 3–0 lead over Betty Ann Grubb in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Margaret Court leads 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Margaret Court won the 1969 US Open third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1969* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Margaret Court | 6-1 6-0 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1969* | Locust Valley | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Margaret Court | 6-1 6-3 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1969* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Margaret Court | 6-4 6-0 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margaret Court | — | — | — | 2,487 | 616 | 64 | 90.6% | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 78 | 95 |
| Betty Ann Grubb | — | — | — | 1,822 | 124 | 112 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Margaret Court | Betty Ann Grubb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 103–12 | 89.6% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 15 | 1968 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 1969 | 103–6 | 94.5% | — | 2,236 | 3 | 34 | 1969 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 1970 | 114–6 | 95.0% | — | 2,350 | 7 | 56 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 1971 | 59–4 | 93.7% | — | 2,374 | 8 | 65 | 1971 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 1972 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,400 | 8 | 74 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 6 |
| 1973 | 105–7 | 93.8% | — | 2,432 | 11 | 92 | 1973 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 7 |
| 1974 | 12–2 | 85.7% | — | 2,409 | 11 | 93 | 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 1975 | 40–13 | 75.5% | — | 2,250 | 11 | 94 | 1975 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 7 |
| 1976 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 2,262 | 11 | 95 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| 1977 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 2,200 | 11 | 95 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |