H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Margaret Court vs Helga Masthoff H2H: 5-0
Margaret Court holds a 5–0 lead over Helga Masthoff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Margaret Court leads 4–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Margaret Court won the 1970 Hilversum semifinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 84
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5
–
0
5 main draw meetings
FRG
Age 84
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1970* | Hilversum | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Margaret Court | 6-2 6-4 | Helga Masthoff | Match data |
| Jul 3, 1970* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Margaret Court | 6-8 6-0 6-0 | Helga Masthoff | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1970* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | F | Clay | Margaret Court | 6-2 6-4 | Helga Masthoff | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1969* | Barranquilla | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Margaret Court | 6-3 6-2 | Helga Masthoff | Match data |
| Jun 4, 1968* | Berlin | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Margaret Court | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Helga Masthoff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margaret Court | — | — | — | 2,487 | 616 | 64 | 90.6% | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 78 | 95 |
| Helga Masthoff | — | — | — | 2,084 | 373 | 111 | 77.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 43 | 49 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margaret Court | Helga Masthoff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 25 | 1968 | 103–12 | 89.6% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1969 | 103–6 | 94.5% | — | 2,236 | 3 | 34 | 1968 | 26–12 | 68.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1970 | 114–6 | 95.0% | — | 2,350 | 7 | 56 | 1969 | 42–13 | 76.4% | — | 1,895 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1971 | 59–4 | 93.7% | — | 2,374 | 8 | 65 | 1970 | 50–11 | 82.0% | — | 2,046 | 0 | 16 |
| 29 | 1972 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,400 | 8 | 74 | 1971 | 38–9 | 80.9% | — | 2,053 | 0 | 23 |
| 30 | 1973 | 105–7 | 93.8% | — | 2,432 | 11 | 92 | 1972 | 28–11 | 71.8% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 27 |
| 31 | 1974 | 12–2 | 85.7% | — | 2,409 | 11 | 93 | 1973 | 36–13 | 73.5% | — | 2,028 | 0 | 29 |
| 32 | 1975 | 40–13 | 75.5% | — | 2,250 | 11 | 94 | 1974 | 27–9 | 75.0% | — | 2,013 | 0 | 32 |
| 33 | 1976 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 2,262 | 11 | 95 | 1975 | 25–8 | 75.8% | — | 1,972 | 0 | 36 |
| 34 | 1977 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 2,200 | 11 | 95 | 1976 | 34–8 | 81.0% | — | 1,940 | 0 | 41 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 18–4 | 81.8% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 44 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 13–5 | 72.2% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 44 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 10–1 | 90.9% | — | 1,929 | 0 | 47 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 26–7 | 78.8% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 49 |