H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Margaret Court vs Kate Latham H2H: 2-0
Margaret Court holds a 2–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Margaret Court leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Margaret Court won the 1975 Washington third round 7-6(1) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 84
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 73
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 1975 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Margaret Court | 7-6(1) 6-3 | Kate Latham | Match data |
| Jul 1, 1973* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Margaret Court | 6-2 6-3 | Kate Latham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margaret Court | — | — | — | 2,487 | 616 | 64 | 90.6% | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 78 | 95 |
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,866 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margaret Court | Kate Latham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1968 | 103–12 | 89.6% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 15 | 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1969 | 103–6 | 94.5% | — | 2,236 | 3 | 34 | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1970 | 114–6 | 95.0% | — | 2,350 | 7 | 56 | 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1971 | 59–4 | 93.7% | — | 2,374 | 8 | 65 | 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1972 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,400 | 8 | 74 | 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1973 | 105–7 | 93.8% | — | 2,432 | 11 | 92 | 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1974 | 12–2 | 85.7% | — | 2,409 | 11 | 93 | 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1975 | 40–13 | 75.5% | — | 2,250 | 11 | 94 | 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 1976 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 2,262 | 11 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 2,200 | 11 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |