H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Margaret Court vs Laura Dupont H2H: 5-0
Margaret Court holds a 5–0 lead over Laura Dupont in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Margaret Court leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Margaret Court won the 1975 Westchester fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 84
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5
–
0
5 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 1975* | Westchester | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Margaret Court | 6-2 6-3 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Dec 20, 1974* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Margaret Court | (w/o) | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Sep 28, 1973* | Columbus | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Margaret Court | 6-3 6-0 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1973* | Jersey Shore | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Margaret Court | 6-1 6-3 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1973* | Bethesda | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Margaret Court | 6-0 6-0 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margaret Court | — | — | — | 2,487 | 616 | 64 | 90.6% | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 78 | 95 |
| Laura Dupont | — | — | — | 1,893 | 216 | 244 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margaret Court | Laura Dupont | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1968 | 103–12 | 89.6% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 15 | 1974 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1969 | 103–6 | 94.5% | — | 2,236 | 3 | 34 | 1975 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1970 | 114–6 | 95.0% | — | 2,350 | 7 | 56 | 1976 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1971 | 59–4 | 93.7% | — | 2,374 | 8 | 65 | 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1972 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,400 | 8 | 74 | 1978 | 24–25 | 49.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1973 | 105–7 | 93.8% | — | 2,432 | 11 | 92 | 1979 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1974 | 12–2 | 85.7% | — | 2,409 | 11 | 93 | 1980 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1975 | 40–13 | 75.5% | — | 2,250 | 11 | 94 | 1981 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 1976 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 2,262 | 11 | 95 | 1982 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 1977 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 2,200 | 11 | 95 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 6 |