H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Margaret Court vs Mary Ann Eisel H2H: 5-0

Margaret Court holds a 5–0 lead over Mary Ann Eisel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Margaret Court leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Margaret Court won the 1969 Hurlingham final 7-5 6-1.

AUS Age 84 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 0
5 main-draw meetings
USA Age 79 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Margaret Court 7-5 6-1 Mary Ann Eisel Match data May 18, 1969* F Hurlingham WTA 250 Clay
Margaret Court 6-0 6-3 Mary Ann Eisel Match data Nov 26, 1968* SF London WTA 250 Carpet
Margaret Court 6-3 6-2 Mary Ann Eisel Match data Nov 9, 1968* SF Torquay WTA 250 Carpet
Margaret Court 6-2 6-4 Mary Ann Eisel Match data Oct 28, 1968* F Perth Scotland WTA 250 Carpet
Margaret Court 4-6 6-0 13-11 Mary Ann Eisel Match data Jan 7, 1968* QF Perth WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Margaret Court #6 2,520 613 64 90.5% 11 0 0 4 78 93
Mary Ann Eisel 1,956 172 95 64.4% 0 0 0 0 12 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Margaret Court Mary Ann Eisel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1968 45–22 67.2% 1,772 0 3
22 1969 54–23 70.1% 1,820 0 7
23 1970 33–20 62.3% 1,784 0 11
24 1971 26–19 57.8% 1,870 0 11
25 1968 103–12 89.6% 2,039 0 13 1972 3–6 33.3% 1,832 0 11
26 1969 103–6 94.5% 2,236 3 32 1973 2–1 66.7% 1,844 0 11
27 1970 114–6 95.0% 2,355 7 54 1974 7–2 77.8% 1,865 0 12
28 1971 56–4 93.3% 2,369 8 63 1975 1–1 50.0% 1,856 0 12
29 1972 57–6 90.5% 2,400 8 72 1976 1–1 50.0% 1,844 0 12
30 1973 105–7 93.8% 2,489 11 90
31 1974 12–2 85.7% 2,461 11 91
32 1975 40–13 75.5% #6 2,280 11 92
33 1976 7–1 87.5% 2,289 11 93
34 1977 16–7 69.6% 2,268 11 93

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Margaret Court Mary Ann Eisel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1968 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
22 1969 1 3 4 25.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 26 7 33 78.8% 10 5 15 66.7%
23 1970 5 1 6 83.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 1971 4 3 7 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7%
25 1968 16 1 17 94.1% 19 3 22 86.4% 50 7 57 87.7% 18 1 19 94.7% 1972 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1969 14 2 16 87.5% 32 3 35 91.4% 57 1 58 98.3% 1973 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1970 10 1 11 90.9% 37 2 39 94.9% 58 3 61 95.1% 9 0 9 100.0% 1974 6 0 6 100.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1971 11 0 11 100.0% 12 1 13 92.3% 33 3 36 91.7% 1975 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1972 9 1 10 90.0% 14 4 18 77.8% 14 1 15 93.3% 20 0 20 100.0% 1976 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1973 11 1 12 91.7% 26 2 28 92.9% 30 3 33 90.9% 38 1 39 97.4%
31 1974 3 1 4 75.0% 9 1 10 90.0%
32 1975 8 2 10 80.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 16 5 21 76.2%
33 1976 7 1 8 87.5%
34 1977 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
Career 85 11 96 88.5% 149 19 168 88.7% 265 22 287 92.3% 114 12 126 90.5% 16 12 28 57.1% 46 24 70 65.7% 75 29 104 72.1% 34 28 62 54.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Margaret Court Mary Ann Eisel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1968 1773 127.8 -14 -244 +92 60.9% +0.93 17–7 (71%) -1.99
22 1969 1820 139.1 -21 -61 +133 65.7% +1.05 15–9 (63%) -5.01
23 1970 1785 131.6 +107 -54 +100 60.3% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 1–0 -1.37
24 1971 1871 144.6 +33 -38 +3 55.4% +0.21 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 100.6 -4.54
25 1968 2040 150.5 +188 -205 +56 85.6% +2.92 11–6 (65%) -1.63 1972 1833 126.1 +22 -11 45.8% -0.04 1–5 (17%) 1–1 -1.40
26 1969 2236 164.8 +59 -84 +189 88.7% +3.22 14–4 (78%) -2.85 1973 1844 115.8 +7 66.7% +1.33 -0.50
27 1970 2355 173.5 +48 -52 +213 90.7% +3.49 12–5 (71%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -4.22 1974 1865 125.8 -56 +61 76.2% +1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) -0.04
28 1971 2369 169.0 +30 -26 +160 88.2% +3.13 7–0 (100%) 6–2 (75%) 108.0 -1.84 1975 1857 107.1 50.0% +0.50 1–1 -0.07
29 1972 2400 174.0 +195 -94 +121 88.1% +3.13 5–1 (83%) 3–2 (60%) 102.9 -4.05 1976 1845 104.6 50.0% +0.50 1–1 +0.12
30 1973 2489 175.9 +187 -49 +77 86.9% +2.92 22–4 (85%) 13–5 (72%) 109.4 -3.54
31 1974 2462 149.5 +158 +109 75.9% +2.14 3–0 (100%) 0–1 -0.89
32 1975 2280 167.2 +119 +62 +182 75.7% +1.94 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 95.4 -3.42
33 1976 2290 137.7 +202 77.8% +1.83 2–0 1–1 -0.88
34 1977 2268 150.4 +124 67.3% +1.31 6–1 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 102.9 -2.67
Career 2521 171.5 +142 -72 +145 86.0% +2.95 86–26 (77%) 32–16 (67%) 109.0 -3.90 1956 139.2 +14 -58 +93 61.0% +0.78 53–39 (58%) 8–9 (47%) 103.3 -5.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.