H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Margaret Court vs Mary Ann Eisel H2H: 5-0

Margaret Court holds a 5–0 lead over Mary Ann Eisel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Margaret Court leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Margaret Court won the 1969 Hurlingham final 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Margaret Court
AUS Age 84 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Mary Ann Eisel
Age 79 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 18, 1969* Hurlingham WTA 250 F Clay Margaret Court 7-5 6-1 Mary Ann Eisel Match data
Nov 26, 1968* London WTA 250 SF Carpet Margaret Court 6-0 6-3 Mary Ann Eisel Match data
Nov 9, 1968* Torquay WTA 250 SF Carpet Margaret Court 6-3 6-2 Mary Ann Eisel Match data
Oct 28, 1968* Perth Scotland WTA 250 F Carpet Margaret Court 6-2 6-4 Mary Ann Eisel Match data
Jan 7, 1968* Perth WTA 250 QF Grass Margaret Court 4-6 6-0 13-11 Mary Ann Eisel Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Margaret Court — — — 2,487 616 64 90.6% 11 2 0 4 78 95
Mary Ann Eisel — — — 1,945 172 95 64.4% 0 0 0 0 12 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Margaret Court Mary Ann Eisel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 1968 45–22 67.2% — 1,774 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 1969 54–23 70.1% — 1,800 0 7
23 — — — — — — — 1970 33–20 62.3% — 1,769 0 11
24 — — — — — — — 1971 26–19 57.8% — 1,862 0 11
25 1968 103–12 89.6% — 2,042 0 15 1972 3–6 33.3% — 1,825 0 11
26 1969 103–6 94.5% — 2,236 3 34 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,837 0 11
27 1970 114–6 95.0% — 2,350 7 56 1974 7–2 77.8% — 1,860 0 12
28 1971 59–4 93.7% — 2,374 8 65 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,852 0 12
29 1972 57–6 90.5% — 2,400 8 74 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,840 0 12
30 1973 105–7 93.8% — 2,432 11 92 — — — — — — —
31 1974 12–2 85.7% — 2,409 11 93 — — — — — — —
32 1975 40–13 75.5% — 2,250 11 94 — — — — — — —
33 1976 7–1 87.5% — 2,262 11 95 — — — — — — —
34 1977 16–7 69.6% — 2,200 11 95 — — — — — — —