H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Margaret Court vs Renata Tomanova H2H: 3-0
Margaret Court holds a 3–0 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Margaret Court leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Margaret Court won the 1977 Los Angeles third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 84
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1977* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Margaret Court | 6-1 6-2 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1977* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Margaret Court | 6-3 6-2 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Jun 29, 1975* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Margaret Court | 6-0 6-0 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margaret Court | — | — | — | 2,487 | 616 | 64 | 90.6% | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 78 | 95 |
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margaret Court | Renata Tomanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1968 | 103–12 | 89.6% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 15 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1969 | 103–6 | 94.5% | — | 2,236 | 3 | 34 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1970 | 114–6 | 95.0% | — | 2,350 | 7 | 56 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1971 | 59–4 | 93.7% | — | 2,374 | 8 | 65 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1972 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,400 | 8 | 74 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1973 | 105–7 | 93.8% | — | 2,432 | 11 | 92 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 1974 | 12–2 | 85.7% | — | 2,409 | 11 | 93 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 1975 | 40–13 | 75.5% | — | 2,250 | 11 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 2,262 | 11 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 2,200 | 11 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |