H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Margaret Court vs Veronica Burton H2H: 3-0
Margaret Court holds a 3–0 lead over Veronica Burton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Margaret Court leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Margaret Court won the 1972 Port Talbot fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 84
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 74
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1972* | Port Talbot | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Margaret Court | 6-2 6-3 | Veronica Burton | Match data |
| May 14, 1970* | Fulham | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Margaret Court | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Veronica Burton | Match data |
| May 8, 1970* | Guildford | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Margaret Court | 6-4 6-1 | Veronica Burton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margaret Court | — | — | — | 2,487 | 616 | 64 | 90.6% | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 78 | 95 |
| Veronica Burton | — | — | — | 1,832 | 139 | 131 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margaret Court | Veronica Burton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 24–19 | 55.8% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 39–20 | 66.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1968 | 103–12 | 89.6% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1969 | 103–6 | 94.5% | — | 2,236 | 3 | 34 | 1978 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1970 | 114–6 | 95.0% | — | 2,350 | 7 | 56 | 1979 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1971 | 59–4 | 93.7% | — | 2,374 | 8 | 65 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1972 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,400 | 8 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1973 | 105–7 | 93.8% | — | 2,432 | 11 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 12–2 | 85.7% | — | 2,409 | 11 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 40–13 | 75.5% | — | 2,250 | 11 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 2,262 | 11 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 2,200 | 11 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |