H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Margaret Court vs Wendy Turnbull H2H: 3-1
Margaret Court holds a 3–1 lead over Wendy Turnbull in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Margaret Court leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Wendy Turnbull won the 1977 Houston fourth round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 84
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 1977* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Wendy Turnbull | 6-4 7-6 | Margaret Court | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1977* | Hollywood | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Margaret Court | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Dec 30, 1974* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Margaret Court | 6-4 6-1 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Jan 8, 1970* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Margaret Court | 6-2 6-2 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margaret Court | — | — | — | 2,487 | 616 | 64 | 90.6% | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 78 | 95 |
| Wendy Turnbull | #346 | #3 | 38 | 2,181 | 585 | 330 | 63.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margaret Court | Wendy Turnbull | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 27–21 | 56.2% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 1968 | 103–12 | 89.6% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 15 | 1978 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 2,064 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1969 | 103–6 | 94.5% | — | 2,236 | 3 | 34 | 1979 | 62–27 | 69.7% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1970 | 114–6 | 95.0% | — | 2,350 | 7 | 56 | 1980 | 69–26 | 72.6% | — | 2,135 | 0 | 14 |
| 28 | 1971 | 59–4 | 93.7% | — | 2,374 | 8 | 65 | 1981 | 45–23 | 66.2% | — | 2,050 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 1972 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,400 | 8 | 74 | 1982 | 47–20 | 70.1% | — | 2,070 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | 1973 | 105–7 | 93.8% | — | 2,432 | 11 | 92 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 18 |
| 31 | 1974 | 12–2 | 85.7% | — | 2,409 | 11 | 93 | 1984 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #5 | 2,022 | 0 | 18 |
| 32 | 1975 | 40–13 | 75.5% | — | 2,250 | 11 | 94 | 1985 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,960 | 0 | 18 |
| 33 | 1976 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 2,262 | 11 | 95 | 1986 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,864 | 0 | 18 |
| 34 | 1977 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 2,200 | 11 | 95 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,779 | 0 | 18 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #135 | 1,651 | 0 | 18 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,631 | 0 | 18 |