H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Margarita Gasparyan vs Karin Knapp H2H: 1-1
Margarita Gasparyan and Karin Knapp are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karin Knapp leads 1–0 on clay, while Margarita Gasparyan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karin Knapp won the 2016 Madrid second round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2016 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Karin Knapp | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Margarita Gasparyan | Match data |
| Aug 1, 2015* | Baku | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Margarita Gasparyan | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Karin Knapp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margarita Gasparyan | #1,358 | #41 | 1,213 | 1,773 | 50 | 57 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Karin Knapp | #971 | #33 | 1,420 | 1,712 | 103 | 117 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margarita Gasparyan | Karin Knapp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #205 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #92 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #104 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #125 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #41 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #51 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1358 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #147 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #966 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 |