H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Margarita Gasparyan vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 1-0
Margarita Gasparyan holds a 1–0 lead over Kiki Bertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Margarita Gasparyan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Margarita Gasparyan won the 2018 Linz fourth round 7-5 2-6 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2018* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Margarita Gasparyan | 7-5 2-6 7-6(3) | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margarita Gasparyan | #1,358 | #41 | 1,213 | 1,773 | 50 | 57 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margarita Gasparyan | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2018 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #92 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #104 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #125 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1358 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |