H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Maria Elena Camerin vs Yanchong Chen H2H: 1-0
Maria Elena Camerin holds a 1–0 lead over Yanchong Chen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Elena Camerin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2009 Guangzhou third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2009* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Maria Elena Camerin | 6-2 6-2 | Yanchong Chen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,666 | 97 | 147 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yanchong Chen | — | — | — | 1,516 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maria Elena Camerin | Yanchong Chen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |