H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
María Emilia Salerni vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 1-0
María Emilia Salerni holds a 1–0 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, María Emilia Salerni leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, María Emilia Salerni won the 2001 Charleston second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2001* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | María Emilia Salerni | 6-3 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| María Emilia Salerni | #328 | #65 | 471 | 1,553 | 30 | 60 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| María Emilia Salerni | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #148 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #241 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #330 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |