H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez vs Aravane Rezai H2H: 1-1
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez and Aravane Rezai are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez leads 1–0 on grass, while Aravane Rezai leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez won the 2010 Eastbourne fourth round 6-2 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2010* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | 6-2 3-0 (ret.) | Aravane Rezai | Match data |
| Nov 9, 2009* | Tournament of Champions | WTA Finals | SF | Hard | Aravane Rezai | 6-2 6-3 | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | #761 | #19 | 2,635 | 1,891 | 105 | 99 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Aravane Rezai | #685 | #15 | 3,100 | 1,879 | 109 | 117 | 48.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Aravane Rezai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #93 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #90 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #25 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2006 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,582 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2008 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #171 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2009 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,523 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2010 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #35 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #162 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #555 | 1,678 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |