H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez vs Barbara Schett H2H: 1-0
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez won the 2001 Madrid third round 7-5 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2001* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | 7-5 2-6 6-4 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | #761 | #19 | 2,635 | 1,891 | 105 | 99 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Barbara Schett | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #93 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2006 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2008 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2009 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2010 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #35 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #162 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #555 | 1,678 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |