H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez vs Els Callens H2H: 1-0
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez holds a 1–0 lead over Els Callens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez won the 2001 Antwerp fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2001* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | 6-3 6-4 | Els Callens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | #761 | #19 | 2,635 | 1,891 | 105 | 99 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Els Callens | #473 | #43 | 582 | 1,716 | 82 | 127 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Els Callens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #93 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #110 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #95 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #51 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #35 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #162 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #555 | 1,678 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #67 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #224 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |