H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez vs Jelena Jankovic H2H: 2-0
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez holds a 2–0 lead over Jelena Jankovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez won the 2011 Wimbledon first round 5-7 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| May 9, 2010* | Rome | WTA 1000 | F | Clay | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | #761 | #19 | 2,635 | 1,891 | 105 | 99 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Jelena Jankovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #93 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2006 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2008 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2009 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2010 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #35 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #162 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #555 | 1,678 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 |