H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez vs Petra Cetkovska H2H: 0-1
Petra Cetkovska holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Cetkovska leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Cetkovska won the 2009 Acapulco fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2009* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Petra Cetkovska | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | #761 | #19 | 2,635 | 1,891 | 105 | 99 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Petra Cetkovska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #93 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #35 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #162 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #555 | 1,678 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |