H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez vs Vania King H2H: 1-0

Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez holds a 1–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez won the 2009 China Open second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez
Spain Age 44 Left-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #38 6-4 6-4 Vania King #91 Match data Oct 7, 2009* R32 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #761 #19 2,635 1,894 107 101 51.4% 0 1 0 0 4 5
Vania King #824 #50 1,225 1,767 128 160 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1
18 2001 10–16 38.5% #93 1,520 0 0 2007 15–21 41.7% #109 1,625 0 1
19 2002 0–4 0.0% #282 1,461 0 0 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,519 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,591 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,597 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,691 0 1
23 2006 5–6 45.5% #106 1,488 0 0 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,617 0 1
24 2007 2–2 50.0% #174 1,506 0 0 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1
25 2008 7–9 43.8% #93 1,556 0 0 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1
26 2009 30–17 63.8% #26 1,781 0 2 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1
27 2010 23–16 59.0% #28 1,806 0 3 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1
28 2011 23–17 57.5% #35 1,818 0 5 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1
29 2012 6–13 31.6% #162 1,677 0 5 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1
30 2013 1–1 50.0% #555 1,668 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez Vania King
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2001 0 4 4 0.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 11 14 25 44.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2007 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2008 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2009 11 9 20 55.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2010 11 11 22 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2011 12 10 22 54.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2013 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 50 88 43.2% 61 41 102 59.8% 8 10 18 44.4% — 96 109 205 46.8% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 148/178 of Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez's and 237/288 of Vania King's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez Vania King
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/36 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9%
23 2006 1/11 0.0 2.0 55.8% 31.0% 39.1% 53.3% 28.6% 34.6% 40.0% 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5%
24 2007 3/4 3.0 4.3 60.5% 58.4% 47.3% 54.9% 69.2% 53.3% 51.1% 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1%
25 2008 13/16 2.8 2.0 55.4% 65.0% 46.6% 60.2% 51.5% 57.0% 44.5% 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6%
26 2009 41/47 3.6 2.5 53.0% 68.2% 48.5% 56.6% 51.7% 59.1% 45.0% 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7%
27 2010 37/39 4.4 2.8 53.9% 69.4% 47.4% 58.5% 46.3% 59.1% 44.1% 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1%
28 2011 37/40 2.3 3.1 54.7% 66.0% 45.0% 50.5% 45.9% 56.7% 44.1% 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6%
29 2012 14/19 2.3 3.8 57.0% 57.8% 42.5% 47.2% 44.7% 51.4% 38.8% 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7%
30 2013 2/2 0.5 1.0 66.7% 59.3% 58.9% 50.0% 41.7% 59.0% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 148/208 3.2 2.8 54.6% 66.1% 46.7% 54.8% 48.3% 57.3% 44.0% — 237/288 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez Vania King
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14
18 2001 1521 114.8 — — — — -18 +66 — 38.7% -0.92 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.35 2007 1625 116.9 -1.39 -3.73 0.818 45.8% +17 -157 +16 43.0% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.4 -1.23
19 2002 1462 95.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.36 2008 1519 117.6 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +49 -52 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -1.09
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1592 114.9 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +21 -123 -33 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 +0.36
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1598 117.8 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +24 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.43
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1691 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -18 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31
23 2006 1489 110.8 -2.04 -2.00 0.612 37.3% -75 +135 — 46.2% +0.04 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.2 +0.19 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -46 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01
24 2007 1506 110.3 -2.03 +0.86 1.092 52.3% — +140 — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 1–1 — -0.08 2013 1631 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% +1 -43 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53
25 2008 1556 123.2 +0.69 +0.59 1.033 50.5% -136 +102 +74 44.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.04 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +18 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14
26 2009 1781 138.2 +3.43 +1.20 1.100 51.5% -175 +81 — 60.9% +0.45 11–10 (52%) 6–3 (67%) 106.6 +0.37 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02
27 2010 1807 143.6 +3.06 +1.20 1.078 51.4% -128 +98 -159 55.7% +0.42 7–7 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 101.9 -1.22 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71
28 2011 1819 139.3 +0.93 +0.43 1.019 50.2% -71 +47 -121 57.3% +0.43 4–5 (44%) 9–4 (69%) 103.5 -1.02 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16
29 2012 1677 115.8 -1.76 -1.58 0.798 45.1% -13 +152 -9 37.2% -0.95 1–6 (14%) — — -0.84 2018 1560 104.4 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +6 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17
30 2013 1669 99.6 -1.32 -1.04 1.045 51.4% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.03 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1630 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1583 96.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1895 134.8 +1.77 +0.63 1.030 50.4% -104 +88 -60 51.1% 0.00 34–43 (44%) 25–20 (56%) 102.4 -1.26 — 1767 127.9 -0.67 -0.74 0.935 48.6% +17 -80 -68 46.2% -0.31 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 104.0 -1.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.