H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-3

Venus Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2011 Wimbledon third round 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez
ESP Age 43 Left-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Venus Williams #30 6-0 6-2 Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #76 Match data
Jun 28, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Venus Williams #7 6-1 7-5 Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #101 Match data
Jan 17, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Venus Williams #3 6-3 2-6 6-0 Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #152 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #761 #19 2,635 1,891 105 99 51.5% 0 1 0 0 4 5
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2001 10–16 38.5% #93 1,520 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2002 0–4 0.0% #282 1,461 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 — — — — — — — 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 — — — — — — — 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 — — — — — — — 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2006 5–6 45.5% #106 1,488 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2007 2–2 50.0% #174 1,505 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2008 6–8 42.9% #93 1,542 0 0 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2009 30–17 63.8% #26 1,778 0 2 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2010 23–16 59.0% #28 1,804 0 3 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2011 23–17 57.5% #35 1,817 0 5 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2012 5–12 29.4% #162 1,687 0 5 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2013 1–1 50.0% #555 1,678 0 5 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47