H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Maria Kirilenko vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-3

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 3–0 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 2013 Seoul fourth round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Kirilenko
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 20, 2013* Seoul WTA 250 R16 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-3 6-1 Maria Kirilenko #19 Match data
Jun 16, 2011* 's Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R32 Grass Kimiko Date Krumm 7-6(5) 6-2 Maria Kirilenko #27 Match data
Sep 26, 2009* Seoul WTA 250 SF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 3-6 6-2 6-4 Maria Kirilenko #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,910 282 228 55.3% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Kirilenko Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,741 0 1 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,656 0 1 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,722 0 5 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,719 0 5 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,827 0 5 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,816 0 5 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2012 29–20 59.2% #14 1,775 0 5 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,786 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,698 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8