H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Maria Lindstrom vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 0-1
Tami Whitlinger Jones holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Lindstrom in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tami Whitlinger Jones won the 1989 Los Angeles third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 63
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1989* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Tami Whitlinger Jones | 6-4 6-3 | Maria Lindstrom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Lindstrom | — | — | — | 1,616 | 38 | 66 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | — | — | — | 1,786 | 106 | 135 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Lindstrom | Tami Whitlinger Jones | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |