H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Maria Sakkari vs Camila Osorio H2H: 2-1
Maria Sakkari holds a 2–1 lead over Camila Osorio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Maria Sakkari leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Camila Osorio won the 2025 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GRE
Age 30
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2025 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Camila Osorio | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
| Sep 14, 2023* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Maria Sakkari | 6-3 2-2 (ret.) | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2022* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Maria Sakkari | 6-2 6-3 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sakkari | #37 | #3 | 5,085 | 2,033 | 259 | 205 | 55.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Sakkari | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #98 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #22 | 1,881 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2021 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #6 | 1,917 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #32 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #37 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |