Maria Sakkari
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | 5 | 7 | 12 | Jul 30, 2025 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 5 | 6 | 11 | Aug 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Anett Kontaveit | 5 | 6 | 11 | Feb 13, 2022 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 4 | 6 | 10 | Aug 17, 2026 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 3 | 7 | 10 | Oct 30, 2023 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Maria Sakkari vs Lucie Hradecka
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Maria Sakkari vs Lucie Hradecka.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Hradecka | 2-6 6-3 5-1 | Maria Sakkari | Match data | Jul 18, 2016 | Q2 | Bastad | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sakkari | #35 | #3 | 5,085 | 2,034 | 266 | 211 | 55.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Lucie Hradecka | #1,142 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,725 | 92 | 121 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Sakkari | Lucie Hradecka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #98 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #22 | 1,884 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #64 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #6 | 1,955 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #110 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #166 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Maria Sakkari | Lucie Hradecka | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 15 | 17 | 32 | 46.9% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2007 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2021 | 28 | 15 | 43 | 65.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2010 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2022 | 25 | 14 | 39 | 64.1% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2011 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2023 | 26 | 17 | 43 | 60.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2012 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2024 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2013 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 2025 | 11 | 16 | 27 | 40.7% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2014 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2015 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 168 | 134 | 302 | 55.6% | 69 | 50 | 119 | 58.0% | 29 | 27 | 56 | 51.8% | — | 42 | 70 | 112 | 37.5% | 49 | 43 | 92 | 53.3% | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 452/476 of Maria Sakkari's and 193/209 of Lucie Hradecka's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Maria Sakkari | Lucie Hradecka | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 2016 | 17/17 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 70.8% | 59.0% | 39.3% | 49.2% | 38.2% | 53.2% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 34/35 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 66.5% | 59.8% | 45.7% | 47.5% | 48.3% | 55.0% | 43.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 45/46 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 58.6% | 63.6% | 47.3% | 54.1% | 49.5% | 56.8% | 42.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 51/51 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 58.3% | 65.3% | 47.4% | 54.0% | 48.7% | 58.1% | 44.7% | 2008 | 5/7 | 4.4 | 6.2 | 51.8% | 71.1% | 42.3% | 56.1% | 51.6% | 57.2% | 44.6% |
| 24 | 2020 | 31/31 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 60.8% | 67.5% | 50.3% | 52.5% | 44.3% | 60.6% | 43.3% | 2009 | 24/25 | 4.7 | 5.7 | 53.4% | 71.1% | 49.0% | 48.0% | 44.0% | 60.8% | 42.9% |
| 25 | 2021 | 51/58 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 56.7% | 70.7% | 47.6% | 60.0% | 45.4% | 60.6% | 44.7% | 2010 | 22/22 | 4.8 | 6.0 | 50.2% | 68.4% | 45.5% | 49.2% | 38.3% | 56.1% | 38.8% |
| 26 | 2022 | 63/63 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 58.5% | 68.7% | 49.4% | 56.8% | 43.5% | 60.7% | 43.4% | 2011 | 35/36 | 6.7 | 4.6 | 52.3% | 71.6% | 44.4% | 55.6% | 47.7% | 58.6% | 41.1% |
| 27 | 2023 | 59/59 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 59.6% | 67.2% | 48.5% | 61.6% | 44.4% | 59.5% | 43.0% | 2012 | 35/35 | 6.5 | 4.9 | 53.4% | 73.2% | 46.3% | 54.8% | 44.6% | 60.8% | 38.8% |
| 28 | 2024 | 32/36 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 59.1% | 68.5% | 46.1% | 58.0% | 46.4% | 59.4% | 42.9% | 2013 | 10/16 | 3.0 | 5.9 | 55.8% | 65.2% | 37.7% | 52.7% | 36.8% | 52.7% | 35.5% |
| 29 | 2025 | 35/45 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 60.2% | 63.2% | 46.5% | 50.3% | 42.9% | 56.3% | 42.9% | 2014 | 6/6 | 7.7 | 6.3 | 52.3% | 77.4% | 42.9% | 66.9% | 37.6% | 61.1% | 41.0% |
| 30 | 2026 | 34/35 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 61.6% | 64.1% | 51.0% | 52.1% | 52.4% | 58.6% | 42.2% | 2015 | 29/34 | 6.0 | 4.9 | 56.8% | 71.5% | 49.2% | 49.7% | 47.5% | 61.6% | 39.5% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18/19 | 4.4 | 5.5 | 49.6% | 69.1% | 44.0% | 48.8% | 38.7% | 56.2% | 39.4% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7/7 | 6.7 | 4.4 | 53.8% | 73.2% | 46.9% | 48.6% | 38.1% | 61.0% | 39.3% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 54.2% | 79.5% | 36.4% | 57.1% | 40.0% | 59.7% | 33.3% |
| 36 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 66.7% | 63.9% | 55.6% | 60.0% | 55.6% | 61.1% | 53.3% |
| Career | — | 452/477 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 60.1% | 65.9% | 47.7% | 55.1% | 46.0% | 58.5% | 43.4% | — | 193/213 | 5.6 | 5.2 | 53.1% | 71.1% | 45.8% | 52.2% | 43.6% | 59.1% | 40.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Maria Sakkari | Lucie Hradecka | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 2015 | 1480 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 1498 | 118.0 | -1.88 | -0.74 | 0.929 | 48.0% | -42 | +76 | — | 39.5% | -0.84 | 2–7 (22%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 1682 | 121.4 | -0.82 | -0.68 | 0.959 | 49.1% | -31 | -161 | -2 | 50.0% | -0.47 | 7–5 (58%) | 6–2 (75%) | 106.7 | +0.44 | 2006 | 1491 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -0.86 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.06 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1683 | 137.5 | +0.35 | +0.12 | 0.988 | 50.0% | -28 | -6 | -50 | 50.0% | -0.06 | 4–8 (33%) | 6–3 (67%) | 99.9 | +0.34 | 2007 | 1476 | 94.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.04 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1802 | 145.4 | +1.49 | +2.58 | 1.067 | 51.3% | -77 | +60 | -130 | 54.6% | +0.29 | 10–9 (53%) | 6–6 (50%) | 103.4 | -0.39 | 2008 | 1522 | 116.1 | +0.28 | -0.38 | 1.043 | 51.8% | — | +57 | — | 60.0% | +1.27 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.18 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1885 | 152.6 | +2.80 | +1.40 | 1.098 | 51.8% | +7 | -62 | — | 61.8% | +0.51 | 7–7 (50%) | 9–1 (90%) | 106.7 | +0.50 | 2009 | 1600 | 113.4 | +2.94 | -1.31 | 1.096 | 52.0% | -63 | +42 | — | 52.5% | +0.25 | 6–5 (55%) | 2–4 (33%) | 101.1 | +1.41 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1955 | 163.4 | +4.17 | +3.15 | 1.135 | 52.3% | +3 | -36 | — | 64.3% | +0.98 | 8–11 (42%) | 5–8 (38%) | 94.2 | -1.76 | 2010 | 1499 | 111.9 | -0.60 | -4.41 | 0.885 | 47.5% | -50 | +122 | — | 31.9% | -0.96 | 0–5 (0%) | 2–3 (40%) | 94.3 | -0.10 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1919 | 155.0 | +3.75 | +1.73 | 1.104 | 51.9% | +44 | +18 | -164 | 61.6% | +0.74 | 12–12 (50%) | 7–10 (41%) | 93.6 | +1.65 | 2011 | 1581 | 128.7 | +2.75 | -1.69 | 0.993 | 49.9% | -48 | +51 | — | 50.0% | -0.07 | 3–11 (21%) | 3–5 (38%) | 94.0 | -0.58 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1884 | 156.5 | +2.61 | +1.63 | 1.060 | 51.1% | +44 | +25 | -123 | 55.9% | +0.47 | 12–8 (60%) | 6–8 (43%) | 99.9 | +0.82 | 2012 | 1653 | 123.3 | +3.46 | -3.66 | 0.991 | 49.7% | -39 | +6 | — | 51.3% | -0.09 | 3–3 (50%) | 10–5 (67%) | 104.7 | -0.15 |
| 28 | 2024 | 1839 | 149.7 | +2.38 | +0.63 | 1.058 | 51.4% | +92 | +66 | -85 | 58.4% | +0.87 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.5 | +2.20 | 2013 | 1562 | 108.1 | -2.03 | -4.06 | 0.752 | 44.2% | -32 | +96 | — | 36.1% | -0.94 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | 95.1 | +0.39 |
| 29 | 2025 | 1782 | 142.5 | +0.02 | -0.02 | 0.982 | 49.5% | +21 | +84 | -66 | 44.4% | -0.39 | 5–5 (50%) | 7–6 (54%) | 99.1 | -1.36 | 2014 | 1587 | 119.5 | +2.19 | +0.06 | 1.055 | 51.1% | -26 | — | — | 53.3% | +0.13 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.1 | -0.33 |
| 30 | 2026 | 1820 | 146.8 | +1.96 | +0.37 | 1.021 | 50.5% | +44 | +1 | -112 | 50.6% | +0.12 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–6 (40%) | 98.2 | +0.37 | 2015 | 1642 | 127.6 | +3.16 | -1.64 | 1.028 | 50.2% | -66 | +87 | -139 | 46.3% | -0.26 | 9–3 (75%) | 2–4 (33%) | 105.6 | -2.33 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1580 | 113.8 | -0.39 | -1.79 | 0.900 | 47.8% | -16 | +88 | — | 32.5% | -0.90 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.3 | -0.40 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1620 | 113.7 | +2.37 | -0.32 | 1.008 | 50.4% | -16 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.38 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.49 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1616 | 101.7 | +2.29 | +2.10 | 0.828 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.02 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1597 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1550 | 93.8 | +0.91 | +0.06 | 1.371 | 57.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| Career | — | 2034 | 152.6 | +1.91 | +1.20 | 1.046 | 50.9% | +11 | +8 | -103 | 55.0% | +0.30 | 77–82 (48%) | 59–56 (51%) | 99.5 | +0.60 | — | 1726 | 122.6 | +1.93 | -2.27 | 0.977 | 49.5% | -43 | +67 | -139 | 45.1% | -0.27 | 27–36 (43%) | 26–33 (44%) | 99.1 | -1.07 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Lucie Hradecka
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 6, 2016 | H2H |
| Lucie Safarova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 16, 2017 | H2H |
| Roberta Vinci | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 25, 2016 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Makarova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mar 12, 2016 | H2H |
| Annika Beck | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 11, 2016 | H2H |