H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 18:56 UTC

Maria Sakkari vs Venus Williams H2H: 1-2

Venus Williams holds a 2–1 lead over Maria Sakkari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Sakkari won the 2018 San Jose quarterfinal 6-4 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Sakkari
GRE Age 30 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 4, 2018* San Jose WTA 500 QF Hard Maria Sakkari #49 6-4 7-6(2) Venus Williams #14 Match data
Sep 3, 2017* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Venus Williams #9 6-3 6-4 Maria Sakkari #95 Match data
Jun 30, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Venus Williams #8 7-5 4-6 6-3 Maria Sakkari #115 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Maria Sakkari #37 #3 5,085 2,033 259 206 55.7% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Sakkari Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2015 0–1 0.0% #169 1,479 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2016 5–12 29.4% #98 1,496 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2017 18–18 50.0% #53 1,684 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2018 22–23 48.9% #41 1,688 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2019 29–22 56.9% #23 1,800 0 1 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2020 20–11 64.5% #22 1,881 0 1 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2021 36–19 65.5% #6 1,952 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2022 40–23 63.5% #6 1,917 0 1 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2023 35–24 59.3% #9 1,882 0 2 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2024 19–14 57.6% #32 1,844 0 2 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2025 20–25 44.4% #52 1,783 0 2 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2026 15–14 51.7% #37 1,811 0 2 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47