H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
María Sánchez Lorenzo vs Akiko Morigami H2H: 0-1
Akiko Morigami holds a 1–0 lead over María Sánchez Lorenzo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Akiko Morigami leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Akiko Morigami won the 2005 Tokyo third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 46
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2005* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Akiko Morigami | 6-4 6-1 | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | #1,067 | #33 | 939 | 1,727 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Akiko Morigami | #402 | #41 | 775 | 1,714 | 78 | 108 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Akiko Morigami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #117 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #72 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #41 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #214 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #62 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #42 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #49 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #87 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2006 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #252 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #407 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |