H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
María Sánchez Lorenzo vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 1-0
María Sánchez Lorenzo holds a 1–0 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, María Sánchez Lorenzo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, María Sánchez Lorenzo won the 2001 Madrid third round 6-4 6-7(2) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2001* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | María Sánchez Lorenzo | 6-4 6-7(2) 6-0 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | #1,067 | #33 | 939 | 1,727 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #117 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #72 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #41 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #214 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #42 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2006 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |