H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
María Sánchez Lorenzo vs Barbara Schett H2H: 2-1
María Sánchez Lorenzo holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, María Sánchez Lorenzo leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, María Sánchez Lorenzo won the 2003 Madrid semifinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2003* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | María Sánchez Lorenzo | 6-1 6-3 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1997* | Maria Lankowitz | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Barbara Schett | 6-4 6-1 | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1994* | Styria | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | María Sánchez Lorenzo | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | #1,067 | #33 | 939 | 1,727 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Barbara Schett | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #117 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #72 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #41 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2000 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #214 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2003 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #42 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2005 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2006 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |