H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

María Sánchez Lorenzo vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 0-3

Chanda Rubin holds a 3–0 lead over María Sánchez Lorenzo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2004 US Open first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

María Sánchez Lorenzo
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Chanda Rubin #22 6-2 6-2 María Sánchez Lorenzo #47 Match data
Sep 12, 2003* Bali WTA 250 R16 Hard Chanda Rubin #10 6-2 6-2 María Sánchez Lorenzo #49 Match data
May 25, 2003* Madrid WTA 1000 F Clay Chanda Rubin #8 6-4 5-7 6-4 María Sánchez Lorenzo #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
María Sánchez Lorenzo #1,067 #33 939 1,727 127 180 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age María Sánchez Lorenzo Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1994 3–4 42.9% #131 1,521 0 0 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1995 4–6 40.0% #125 1,554 0 0 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 1996 4–11 26.7% #117 1,500 0 0 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 1997 10–10 50.0% #53 1,636 0 0 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 1998 10–21 32.3% #72 1,599 0 0 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 1999 19–21 47.5% #41 1,670 0 1 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 2000 9–15 37.5% #97 1,606 0 1 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 2001 4–9 30.8% #214 1,566 0 1 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 2002 2–5 28.6% #111 1,519 0 1 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 2003 22–18 55.0% #42 1,655 0 1 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 2004 22–25 46.8% #51 1,654 0 1 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 2005 9–20 31.0% #83 1,530 0 1 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2006 9–15 37.5% #141 1,520 0 1 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 — — — — — — — 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 — — — — — — — 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7