H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
María Sánchez Lorenzo vs Flora Perfetti H2H: 2-1
María Sánchez Lorenzo holds a 2–1 lead over Flora Perfetti in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while María Sánchez Lorenzo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, María Sánchez Lorenzo won the 1998 Istanbul third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 57
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1998* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | María Sánchez Lorenzo | 6-0 6-1 | Flora Perfetti | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1997* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | María Sánchez Lorenzo | 6-4 6-4 | Flora Perfetti | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Flora Perfetti | 4-6 6-2 11-9 | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | #1,067 | #33 | 939 | 1,727 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Flora Perfetti | #415 | #54 | 419 | 1,600 | 31 | 59 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Flora Perfetti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #117 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #72 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #41 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #214 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #108 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #315 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #42 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #69 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #102 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |